Frank Rich's column in the New York Times is always worth a read. Unfortunately the Times puts his work behind a 'pay-wall' called Times Select. I doubt Mr. Rich is a fan of this.
Anyhew, I happen to pay for Times Select and present for your edification Frank's most recent column. Don't read it if you're the kind that gets easily upset. We're watching right now - IN REAL TIME - these people, these world criminals, loot the U.S. Treasury, and cause untold misery to hundreds of thousands of people. I fully expect my children and grandchildren to ask me why - why didn't I do more - to alleviate the suffering the U.S. Federal government is causing right now around this tiny planet.
The Ides of March 2003
By FRANK RICH
Published: March 18, 2007
TOMORROW night is the fourth anniversary of President Bush’s
prime-time address declaring the start of Operation Iraqi Freedom. In
the broad sweep of history, four years is a nanosecond, but in America,
where memories are congenitally short, it’s an eternity. That’s why a
revisionist history of the White House’s rush to war, much of it
written by its initial cheerleaders, has already taken hold. In this
exonerating fictionalization of the story, nearly every politician and
pundit in Washington was duped by the same “bad intelligence” before
the war, and few imagined that the administration would so botch the
invasion’s aftermath or that the occupation would go on so long. “If
only I had known then what I know now ...” has been the persistent
refrain of the war supporters who subsequently disowned the fiasco. But
the embarrassing reality is that much of the damning truth about the
administration’s case for war and its hubristic expectations for a
cakewalk were publicly available before the war, hiding in plain sight,
to be seen by anyone who wanted to look.
By the time the ides
of March arrived in March 2003, these warning signs were visible on a
nearly daily basis. So were the signs that Americans were completely
ill prepared for the costs ahead. Iraq was largely anticipated as a
distant, mildly disruptive geopolitical video game that would be over
in a flash.
Now many of the same leaders who sold the war argue
that escalation should be given a chance. This time they’re peddling
the new doomsday scenario that any withdrawal timetable will lead to
the next 9/11. The question we must ask is: Has history taught us
anything in four years?
Here is a chronology of some of the high
and low points in the days leading up to the national train wreck whose
anniversary we mourn this week [with occasional “where are they now”
updates].
March 5, 2003
“I took the Grey Poupon out of my cupboard.”
— Representative Duke Cunningham, Republican of California, on the floor of the House denouncing French opposition to the Iraq war.
[In November 2005, he resigned from Congress and pleaded guilty to accepting bribes from defense contractors. In January 2007, the United States attorney who prosecuted him — Carol Lam, a Bush appointee — was forced to step down for “performance-related” issues by Alberto Gonzales’s Justice Department.]
March 6, 2003
President Bush holds his last prewar news conference.
The New York Observer writes that he interchanged Iraq with the attacks
of 9/11 eight times, “and eight times he was unchallenged.” The ABC
News White House correspondent, Terry Moran, says the Washington press
corps was left “looking like zombies.”
March 7, 2003
Appearing
before the United Nations Security Council on the same day that the
United States and three allies (Britain, Spain and Bulgaria) put forth
their resolution demanding that Iraq disarm by March 17, the director
general of the International Atomic Energy Agency, Mohamed ElBaradei,
reports there is “no evidence or plausible indication of the revival of a nuclear weapons program in Iraq.”.
He adds that documents “which formed the basis for the report of recent
uranium transaction between Iraq and Niger are in fact not authentic.”
None of the three broadcast networks’ evening newscasts mention his
findings.
[In 2005 ElBaradei was awarded the Nobel Peace Prize.]
March 10, 2003
Natalie Maines of the Dixie Chicks tells an audience in England,
“We do not want this war, this violence, and we’re ashamed that the
president of the United States is from Texas.” Boycotts, death threats
and anti-Dixie Chicks demonstrations follow.
[In 2007, the Dixie Chicks won five Grammy Awards, including best song for “Not Ready to Make Nice.”]
March 12, 2003
A senior military planner tells The Daily News “an attack on Iraq could last as few as seven days.”
“Isn’t
it more likely that antipathy toward the United States in the Islamic
world might diminish amid the demonstrations of jubilant Iraqis
celebrating the end of a regime that has few equals in its
ruthlessness?”
— John McCain, writing for the Op-Ed page of The New York Times.
“The Pentagon still has not given a name to the Iraqi war. Somehow ‘Operation Re-elect Bush’ doesn’t seem to be popular.”
— Jay Leno, “The Tonight Show.”
March 14, 2003
Senator John D. Rockefeller, Democrat of West Virginia, asks the F.B.I. to investigate the forged documents
cited a week earlier by ElBaradei and alleging an Iraq-Niger uranium
transaction: “There is a possibility that the fabrication of these
documents may be part of a larger deception campaign aimed at
manipulating public opinion and foreign policy regarding Iraq.”
March 16, 2003
On
“Meet the Press,” Dick Cheney says that American troops will be
“greeted as liberators,” that Saddam “has a longstanding relationship
with various terrorist groups, including the Al Qaeda organization,”
and that it is an “overstatement” to suggest that several hundred
thousand troops will be needed in Iraq after it is liberated. Asked by
Tim Russert about ElBaradei’s statement that Iraq does not have a
nuclear program, the vice president says, “I think Mr. ElBaradei
frankly is wrong.”
“There will be new
recruits, new recruits probably because of the war that’s about to
happen. So we haven’t seen the last of Al Qaeda.”
— Richard Clarke, former White House counterterrorism czar, on ABC’s “This Week.”
[From the recently declassified “key judgments” of the National Intelligence Estimate of April 2006:
“The Iraq conflict has become the cause célèbre for jihadists, breeding
a deep resentment of U.S. involvement in the Muslim world and
cultivating supporters for the global jihadist movement.”]
“Despite the Bush administration’s claims about
Iraq’s weapons of mass destruction, U.S. intelligence agencies have
been unable to give Congress or the Pentagon specific information about
the amounts of banned weapons or where they are hidden, according to
administration officials and members of Congress. Senior intelligence
analysts say they feel caught between the demands from White House,
Pentagon and other government policy makers for intelligence that would
make the administration’s case ‘and what they say is a lack of hard
facts,’ one official said.”
— “U.S. Lacks Specifics on Banned Arms,” by Walter Pincus (with additional reporting by Bob Woodward), The Washington Post, Page A17.
March 17, 2003
Representative Henry Waxman, Democrat of California, who voted for the Iraq war resolution, writes the president
to ask why the administration has repeatedly used W.M.D. evidence that
has turned out to be “a hoax” — “correspondence that indicates that
Iraq sought to obtain nuclear weapons from an African country, Niger.”
[Still
waiting for “an adequate explanation” of the bogus Niger claim four
years later, Waxman, now chairman of the chief oversight committee in
the House, wrote Condoleezza Rice on March 12, 2007, seeking a response “to multiple letters I sent you about this matter.”]
In a prime-time address, President Bush tells Saddam to leave Iraq within 48 hours:
“Every measure has been made to avoid war, and every measure will be
taken to win it.” After the speech, NBC rushes through its analysis to
join a hit show in progress, “Fear Factor,” where men and women walk
with bare feet over broken glass to win $50,000.
March 18, 2003
Barbara
Bush tells Diane Sawyer on ABC’s “Good Morning America” that she will
not watch televised coverage of the war: “Why should we hear about body
bags and deaths, and how many, what day it’s going to happen, and how
many this or what do you suppose? Or, I mean, it’s, it’s not relevant.
So, why should I waste my beautiful mind on something like that?”
[Visiting the homeless victims of another cataclysm, Hurricane Katrina, at the Houston Astrodome in 2005, Mrs. Bush said,
“And so many of the people in the arena here, you know, were
underprivileged anyway, so this — this is working very well for them.”]
In one of its editorials strongly endorsing the war, The Wall Street Journal writes, “There is plenty of evidence that Iraq has harbored Al Qaeda members.”
[In a Feb. 12, 2007, editorial defending the White House’s use of prewar intelligence, The Journal wrote, “Any links between Al Qaeda and Iraq is a separate issue that was barely mentioned in the run-up to war.”]
In an article headlined “Post-war ‘Occupation’ of Iraq Could Result in Chaos,”
Mark McDonald of Knight Ridder Newspapers quotes a “senior leader of
one of Iraq’s closest Arab neighbors,” who says, “We’re worried that
the outcome will be civil war.”
A questioner at a White House news briefing
asserts that “every other war has been accompanied by fiscal austerity
of some sort, often including tax increases” and asks, “What’s
different about this war?” Ari Fleischer responds, “The most important
thing, war or no war, is for the economy to grow,” adding that in the
president’s judgment, “the best way to help the economy to grow is to
stimulate the economy by providing tax relief.”
After
consulting with the homeland security secretary, Tom Ridge, the
N.C.A.A. announces that the men’s basketball tournament will tip off
this week as scheduled. The N.C.A.A. president, Myles Brand, says, “We
were not going to let a tyrant determine how we were going to lead our
lives.”
March 19, 2003
“I’d guess that if it goes beyond three weeks, Bush will be in real trouble.”
— Andrew Bacevich, a retired Army colonel teaching at Boston University, quoted in The Washington Post.
[The March 2007 installment of the Congressionally mandated Pentagon assessment “Measuring Stability and Security in Iraq” reported that from Jan. 1 to Feb. 9, 2007, there were more than 1,000 weekly attacks, up from about 400 in spring 2004.]
Robert
McIlvaine, whose 26-year-old son was killed at the World Trade Center
18 months earlier, is arrested at a peace demonstration at the Capitol
in Washington. He tells The Washington Post: “It’s very insulting to
hear President Bush say this is for Sept. 11.”
“I
don’t think it is reasonable to close the door on inspections after
three and a half months,” when Iraq’s government is providing more
cooperation than it has in more than a decade.
— Hans Blix, chief weapons inspector for the United Nations.
The Washington Post-ABC News poll shows that 71 percent of Americans support going to war in Iraq, up from 59 percent before the president’s March 17 speech.
“When the president talks about sacrifice, I think the American people clearly understand what the president is talking about.”
— Ari Fleischer
[Asked in January 2007 how Americans have sacrificed,
President Bush answered: “I think a lot of people are in this fight. I
mean, they sacrifice peace of mind when they see the terrible images of
violence on TV every night.”]
Pentagon units will “locate and survey at least 130 and as many as 1,400 possible weapons sites.”
— “Disarming Saddam Hussein; Teams of Experts to Hunt Iraq Arms” by Judith Miller, The Times, Page A1.
President Bush declares war from the Oval Office in a national address: “Our nation enters this conflict reluctantly, yet our purpose is sure.”
Price of a share of Halliburton stock: $20.50
[Value of that Halliburton share on March 16, 2007, adjusted for a split in 2006: $64.12.]
March 20, 2003
“The pictures you’re seeing are absolutely phenomenal. These are live
pictures of the Seventh Cavalry racing across the deserts in southern
Iraq. They will — it will be days before they get to Baghdad, but
you’ve never seen battlefield pictures like these before.”
— Walter Rodgers, an embedded CNN correspondent.
“It seems quite odd to me that while we are commenced upon a war, we have no funding for that war in this budget.”
—Hillary Clinton.
“Coalition forces suffered their first casualties in a helicopter crash that left 12 Britons and 4 Americans dead.”
— The Associated Press.
Though
the March 23 Oscar ceremony will dispense with the red carpet in
deference to the war, an E! channel executive announces there will be
no cutback on pre-Oscar programming, but “the tone will be much more
somber.”
March 21, 2003
“I
don’t mean to be glib about this, or make it sound trite, but it really
is a symphony that has to be orchestrated by a conductor.”
— Retired Maj. Gen. Donald Shepperd, CNN military analyst, speaking to Wolf Blitzer of the bombardment of Baghdad during Shock and Awe.
[“Many parts of Iraq are stable. But of course what we see on television is the one bombing a day that discourages everyone.”
— Laura Bush, “Larry King Live,” Feb. 26, 2007.]
“The
president may occasionally turn on the TV, but that’s not how he gets
his news or his information. ... He is the president, he’s made his
decisions and the American people are watching him.”
— Ari Fleischer.
[The former press secretary received immunity from prosecution in the Valerie Wilson leak case and testified in the perjury trial of Scooter Libby in 2007.]
“Peter,
I may be going out on a limb, but I’m not sure that the first stage of
this Shock and Awe campaign is really going to frighten the Iraqi
people. In fact, it may have just the opposite effect. If they feel
that they’ve survived the most that the United States can throw at them
and they’re still standing, and they’re still able to go about their
lives, well, then they might be rather emboldened. They might feel
that, well, look, we can stand a lot more than this.”
— Richard Engel, a Baghdad correspondent speaking to Peter Jennings on ABC’s “World News Tonight.”